AMD's two new processors in the budget range

AMD's two new processors in the budget range | AMD Ryzen 3-3100 & 3-3300x

AMD has recently launched two of its processors in the budget range of 100-120. AMD Ryzen 3-3100x and AMD Ryzen 3-3300x. From the budget and the name, it is possible to guess that these two processors are out of the market to compete with the entry-level gamers and general users and to compete with the processors of Intel's Core i3 level.

Brief specification

AMD Ryzen 3-3100

Base clock/Boost Clock	Cores/Threads	Level 3 Cache	TDP	PCIe	CMOS	Price
3.6/3.9	4/8	16MB	65W	4.0	7nm	99$

AMD Ryzen 3-3300x

Base clock/Boost Clock	Cores/Threads	Level 3 Cache	TDP	PCIe	CMOS	Price
3.8/4.3	4/8	16MB	65W	4.0	7nm	120$

What's in it?

3100 has 4 cores 8 threads, 16 MB cache (3.6 GHz-3.9ghz)

3300x also has 4 cores 8 threads, 16 MB cache

However, the core clock speed is higher than the first. Here is the 3.8-4.3 GHz clock. The TDP of the two is 65 watts.

The architecture of two e ৭ nanometers. And in both cases we have the support of PCIe 4.0.

Priced at 99$ for the AMD Ryzen 3-3100 and 120$ for the AMD Ryzen 3-3300x.

Multitasking performance

The benchmark shows that in terms of productivity, the two processors are outperforming the Core i7 7700k and i5 9400f, with the 3100 Ryzen 5 lagging behind the 1600 and the 3300x AMD Ryzenn 5-1600 far behind the 1600af (which AMD released a few days ago).

And in some cases 2600's or better performance has been seen.

The i3 that was originally targeted and released is not even close to the edge of the benchmark.

7-Zip(Decompression)

SiSoft Sandra

V-Ray

Chromium Code Compile

DaVinci Resolve Studio 16

Cinebench R20(Multi-core)

Cinebench R20(Single Core)

7-Zip(Compression)

ADOBE BENCHMARKS

In particular, both processors are giving a much more impressive performance on the ADOBE benchmark.

ADOBE related benchmarks show that Ryzen 3 is beating 3100, Ryzen 5 2600, 1600AF, or even giving a score equal to 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300x, Ryzen 5 2700x.

Which, of course, made the video an overnight sensation in Adobe, changing the history of AMD's relatively poor performance.

Premiere Pro

Photoshop

Lightroom Classic

After effects

Gaming Performance: The 7700 Killer ????

The Battlefield Five beats the core i7 7700k at 3300x at the FPS and lags behind processors like the Ryzen 7 2700x, 2600, 1600AF, Core i5 9400F.

At Farcry's new dawn, Ryzen 5 gives an equal framerate of 2600 to 3100.

And 3300x 7700k, almost equal to 9400f and Ryzen 7 has left 2700x behind.

The Ryzen 3 lags behind the i7 7700k, Ryzen 7 2700x and Core i5 9400f in gears 5, while the Ryzen 3 3100 lags behind the Ryzen 5 2600,1600 AF.

The Core i7 7700k, 9400f, Ryzen 5 2600, 1600AF also has a significant distance of 3300x.

The average of 7 games shows that the frame rate of 3300x is almost equal to 7700K and is ahead at 1% low.

Battlefield V(DX11)

Far Cry New Dawn(DX11)

Gears 5 Operation 3

Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege(Vulkan)

Ghost Recon Breakpoint(Vulkan)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Red Dead Redemption 2

7 games average

In the BD market, maybe we will get AMD Ryzen 3-3300x in 12/13 thousand and AMD Ryzen 3-3100 in 10 thousand. In that case, two processors are going to be a blessing for low budget users.

AMD's two new processors in the budget range | AMD Ryzen 3-3100 & 3-3300x